The 1% rule in multifamily investing is a general guideline that investors often use to quickly screen potential rental properties, including multifamily units. According to this rule, the monthly rent of a property should be at least 1% of its total purchase price to consider it a good investment. This means if you’re looking at buying a multifamily property for $500,000, the combined rent from all units should be at least $5,000 per month to meet the 1% rule. [Source:Investopedia.com]
This rule has functioned as a quick way to estimate whether a property is likely to generate positive cash flow, taking into account the mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and other operating expenses. It’s important to note that while the 1% rule can be a helpful initial filter, it’s a very simplistic measure. Investors should conduct a more detailed analysis, considering all expenses, the local rental market, property condition, and potential for appreciation or depreciation, before making an investment decision. I would posit that the 1% rule is no longer effective in today’s real estate climate.
Has the 1% rule for real estate investing lost it’s effectiveness?
The effectiveness of the 1% rule in today’s real estate investment market can vary greatly depending on a number of factors including location, property type, market conditions, and investment goals. Here are some considerations to keep in mind:
- Market Variation: In some markets, especially those that are highly competitive or have experienced significant property value increases, it might be challenging to find properties that meet the 1% rule. In high-cost areas, the rental yields (rent as a percentage of property value) may naturally be lower, making the 1% rule less applicable.
- Property Type and Condition: The type and condition of the property can also impact the applicability of the 1% rule. Properties in need of significant repairs might meet the rule initially but could require substantial additional investment to become rentable, affecting overall returns.
- Investment Strategy: The rule is more suited for cash flow-focused strategies rather than those focusing on capital appreciation. Investors in areas with strong growth potential but lower rental yields might accept lower initial returns for the prospect of significant property value increases.
- Economic and Interest Rate Environment: The broader economic environment, including interest rates, can affect the feasibility of the 1% rule. Rising interest rates, for example, can increase borrowing costs and affect cash flow calculations, making it harder for investments to meet the 1% threshold while still being financially viable.
- Alternative Metrics: Savvy investors often use a range of metrics to evaluate properties, such as the cap rate (capitalization rate), cash on cash return, and NOI (Net Operating Income). These metrics can provide a more nuanced view of an investment’s potential than the 1% rule alone.
While the 1% rule can still serve as a quick screening tool for rental properties, its applicability and effectiveness varies widely in today’s diverse and dynamic real estate markets, making it far less reliable than it use to be.